Rated 1 out of 5 by pennyanne wide legs
Baggy pants are not in style.
These looked iike a slimmer leg in the catalog.
Returned them the same day they arrived.
August 17, 2016
Rated 1 out of 5 by Tatty Inconsistent Quality
I recently bought these pants in stone. They are a soft brushed fabric that is very comfortable, and they fit perfectly. I liked them so much that I immediately ordered them in navy blue. The difference was unbelievable. The blue fabric is as hard and stiff as the roughest denim. Also the waist measured 1 1/2 inches smaller than the stone ones. I've sent them back but am very disappointed.
May 19, 2016
Rated 3 out of 5 by Kachinahorse Love the fabric
Loved the fabric and the stone color but it is just too tight in the waist. For those of us that have had 10lb babies, you need a little more room at the waist.
April 30, 2016
Rated 3 out of 5 by MinCentreville comfortable; inconsistent sizing; cuffs wear fast
I have a high waist and these have a high enough rise to be comfortable, so I really like them when they fit. However, sizing has not been consistent; I ordered some of these a few years ago and they fit; more recently the two pairs of 12P were both too big, by different amounts. Next time a color I like is on sale, I'll try size 10P. Quality is reasonable, but they wear through at the cuffs pretty fast so I usually wait until they are on sale..
April 29, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by nofadswanted Carefree twill are comfortable.
Carefree zip-front cotton poly pants are comfortable, true to size, sit at or above the waist and are sturdy enough for everyday activities including gardening. The only negative is that for cotton poly, they are less durable than one might want. (Holes in the hems after about 6 months of twice weekly washing.)
April 3, 2016
Rated 1 out of 5 by dogowner Terrible
Bought these in other colors and fit nice. The new ones seat was sagging and see through fabric. Have sent them back costing me $9.99 for $11.99 pants! Don't cheapen your products.
March 29, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by Mediaspec Good quality
I like these pants - good quality. The only problem I have is the length. 30" inseam is too long and petite - 28 is too short. I wish there was a 29" length.
March 28, 2016
Rated 3 out of 5 by littlelady50 I REALLY LIKE THE SIDE ELASTIC INSERTS.
I am disappointed! The waist and upper hip are a good fit, but the legs are baggy starting at the upper thigh. Since I am a petite four, there is no smaller size and I will have to have these pants altered. In the past, I have purchase similar slacks from you that fit much better and were not so baggy in the lower hip and legs. I have also had to return tops that were featured as petite small that were too big on me. Perhaps you could carry a petite/petite that was not too short in the body and arms, but was smaller in the neck and body area. Not all petite women are wide!
February 9, 2016